I’m Thankful For the Electoral College

I may regret posting this tomorrow morning, but here are some wise words from Kevin DeYoung:

I’m thankful for the Electoral College. You may not agree, especially if you live in Texas or California or Alabama or Vermont. There’s no “Christian position” on the Electoral College. But I’m grateful that our presidents have to go to every little hamlet in Ohio and Iowa. I’m glad that the election does not come down to voter turnout in the same megacities every four years. I’m glad that because of our confusing process, the most powerful man in the world has to make inroads with people from all over the country. He can’t simply be a regional candidate who promises the Northeast lots of goodies at the expense of the South. He can’t win the White House by racking up 80% of the vote in a handful of states. The President has to be attuned to the needs and desires of the most politically diverse places, not the most politically homogenous. This seems like a good thing to me.

Comments 1

  1. Robb

    The assumption that the electoral college serves a role in keeping small states relevant in the election is just not true. If you look at where the candidates spend their time, it is mostly the states that where the race is close. Ohio, Pennysylvania, Florida, and Virginia are quite populous and are visited quite frequently. There are a few small states like Iowa that are frequented, but only because the race is close there too.

    If we abolish the electoral college, would candidates only spend time in Northeastern cities? No, because the top 10 cities in the country account for less than 8% of the population. Even the top 100 cities in the country account for less than 20% of the population.

    For more information check out this video:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *